[MarkLogic Dev General] Image cropping and binary manipulation

Keith L. Breinholt BreinholtKL at ldschurch.org
Thu Apr 1 07:06:50 PST 2010


I need to correct myself.  It was 9 seconds to convert a 1MB image from binary to hex string...not minutes.

My apologies to MarkLogic and anyone else who were wondering about the extreme amount of time.

We've been spoiled by MarkLogic's response times for everything else we do. 9 seconds is more time than we want to spend on any request.

Keith L. Breinholt
breinholtkl at ldschurch.org

-----Original Message-----
From: general-bounces at developer.marklogic.com [mailto:general-bounces at developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Geert Josten
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 8:50 AM
To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] Image cropping and binary manipulation

Hi Keith,

Do you now that you don't really need to do any calculation to encode binary? You can simply apply string() to it to get a hex encoded string. But I agree that sending binary as binary makes more sense...

Kind regards,
Geert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: general-bounces at developer.marklogic.com 
> [mailto:general-bounces at developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of 
> Keith L. Breinholt
> Sent: donderdag 1 april 2010 16:39
> To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
> Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] Image cropping and 
> binary manipulation
> 
> It's not the sending so much as the fact that 
> xdmp:http-post() and xdmp:http-put() won't allow you to send 
> binary objects.  So you have to hex encode the binary first 
> and then decode it at the other end.
> 
> We did several shots at this and on a 32-bit machine it was 
> taking close to 9 minutes to encode a 1MB file.  Now I assume 
> that performance will be better on a 64-bit machine but even 
> if we cut the time in a quarter that's in the neighborhood of 
> 2 minutes for something that should only take several seconds 
> at most to send and receive.
> 
> I've put a request for enhancement to MarkLogic because there 
> really isn't a good reason not to support sending binary objects.
> 
> In the meantime we're writing the file to an NFS mount and 
> having an external process do the manipulations and write it 
> back to a drop directory.  Takes less than a minute in worst 
> case scenario and it doesn't tie up a MarkLogic server or its 
> resources.
> 
> Keith L. Breinholt
> breinholtkl at ldschurch.org
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: general-bounces at developer.marklogic.com 
> [mailto:general-bounces at developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of 
> Geert Josten
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:45 PM
> To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
> Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] Image cropping and 
> binary manipulation
> 
> Hi Keith,
> 
> Have you actually measured the performance of sending 
> binaries back and forth to MLJAM? And did you compare with 
> plain HTTP attachment submission (or some other method)? I'd 
> be interested in knowing timing differences..
> 
> Kind regards,
> Geert
> 
> >
> 
> 
> drs. G.P.H. (Geert) Josten
> Consultant
> 
> 
> Daidalos BV
> Hoekeindsehof 1-4
> 2665 JZ Bleiswijk
> 
> T +31 (0)10 850 1200
> F +31 (0)10 850 1199
> 
> mailto:geert.josten at daidalos.nl
> http://www.daidalos.nl/
> 
> KvK 27164984
> 
> P Please consider the environment before printing this mail.
> De informatie - verzonden in of met dit e-mailbericht - is 
> afkomstig van Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de 
> geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, 
> verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit bericht kunnen 
> geen rechten worden ontleend.
> 
> >
> > Good suggestion Gert.  Unfortunately the performance for the 
> > encode/decode of the binary makes MLJAM a nonstarter.
> >
> > I appreciate the suggestion though.
> >
> > Keith L. Breinholt
> > breinholtkl at ldschurch.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General at developer.marklogic.com
> http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> 
>  NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the 
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 
> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email 
> and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General at developer.marklogic.com
> http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> _______________________________________________
General mailing list
General at developer.marklogic.com
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.




More information about the General mailing list